Discontinued Foods Bracket: Fruitopia vs. Orbitz Eick March 28, 2013 Discontinued Foods Bracket 3 Comments Voting on this match-up is closed. Fruitopia (64%) defeats Orbitz (36%). Fruitopia was created by Coca-Cola in 1994 and was intended to compete with Snapple and other increasingly popular fruit flavored beverages. In 2003 it was discontinued in the United States, although it still lives on in Australia & Canada as a juice brand. Orbitz was introduced by Clearly Canadian in 1997 and quickly disappeared due to poor sales. Take Our Poll (Click to enlarge and see full bracket) The following two tabs change content below.BioLatest Posts Eick Latest posts by Eick (see all) Fast Food Bracket Round 1: Jack in the Box vs. Five Guys, KFC vs. Checkers - March 3, 2016 BK’s “Polygameat” Campaign Shockingly Similar to Wendy’s “Meatatarian” Campaign - September 16, 2014 Surge Wins Discontinued Foods Bracket! - April 12, 2013 3 Responses Houck54 March 28th, 2013 What exactly is oribtz? Reply Maggy March 30th, 2013 The pearly things found in Orbitz were gross! Reply Scrooge June 4th, 2013 Orbitz and Fruitopia were delicious 😮 It really depended which Orbitz you got for the spheres to taste good 🙂 Fruitopia was always delicious no matter which flavor. I wonder if it’s possible for those drinks to come back to the US. Is Orbitz out of business or just elsewhere? I wonder if anyone can re-register such a trademark Reply Leave a ReplyYour email address will not be published.CommentName* Email* Website Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Notify me of follow-up comments by email. Notify me of new posts by email. Current ye@r * Leave this field empty
Scrooge June 4th, 2013 Orbitz and Fruitopia were delicious 😮 It really depended which Orbitz you got for the spheres to taste good 🙂 Fruitopia was always delicious no matter which flavor. I wonder if it’s possible for those drinks to come back to the US. Is Orbitz out of business or just elsewhere? I wonder if anyone can re-register such a trademark Reply
