Comments on: Deadspin Reports on So Good vs. ESPN

By: So Good Presents: The Fast Food Bracket | So Good

So Good Presents: The Fast Food Bracket | So Good — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:01:20 +0000

[...] in the land. We even had some controversy along the way, as Deadspin accused an ESPN reporter of copying the idea of a meat [...]

By: Meat Madness: The Final Results | So Good

Meat Madness: The Final Results | So Good — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:44:12 +0000

[...] began, we had 32 humble meats and a bevy of interesting first round match-ups. We even had some copycats and controversy along the way. When we concluded, we were left with just one meat champion, Bacon, powered to [...]

By: Paul Lukas is a Douche

Paul Lukas is a Douche — Sat, 28 Mar 2009 00:45:21 +0000

Shatraw, you’d be pleased to know that the ass-kissers on Lukas’ worthless site continue to throw barbs at So Good and its readers. “Nutcases” has been the description of choice. Another classic one was “special breed”, as in, “those people at So Good are a special breed”. As if a bunch of virgins who live in mom’s basement posting comments about uniforms are NOT a “special breed”. Stones and glass houses. In any case, someone actually pointed out to the unwashed masses at Uniwatch that THEY’RE always the first ones to claim that another site is a Uniwatch ripoff whenever it does a uniform-based article, yet have no problem goofing on So Good and Eick when he states (factually and correctly) that his website had a meat bracket the week before the hack posted his on ESPN.com. Much like their god, Lukas’ followers have no problems dishing it out, but taking it is another matter entirely….

By: shatraw

shatraw — Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:57:02 +0000

yeah, i’m over it. yesterday was one of the weirder, most stressful days in my life (thank you left/right productions), so this whole copying my friends blog stuff hit at the right time for me to flip shit. i wanted any blood. his was in the water.

he’s still a dick with a boring website.

By: Skiff

Skiff — Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:36:05 +0000

I haven’t really weighed in on Paul “Embarassment to Mets Fans” Lukas’s bracket yet: its annoying.

First, he picked the meats in the bracket, and 64 was certainly a stretch given some of the crap he included (I love a slim jim as much as the next guy, but really?!?!).

THEN, he went about choosing the matchups. WHATS THE POINT? Just write 1000 words about why you love bacon and be done with it.

And shouldn’t the bracket chalk its way to the finish because he both seeded AND picked the matchups? Wouldn’ t the same factors that led to T-Bone getting seeded 3rd and Ground Chuck (nice specification even though no other ground beef choices made the cut, no room – had to have slim jims) seeded 14th mean that T-Bone wins? Nope, of course not.

By: Skiff

Skiff — Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:20:23 +0000

Stuff like this makes me glad I swore to never cross Shatraw 15 years ago.

By: Paul Lukas is a Douche

Paul Lukas is a Douche — Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:27:35 +0000

Shatraw, if you ever go on his Uniwatch blog, you will never find a bigger bunch of sycophants and losers who worship the ground he walks on. It really is pathetic. And ever since he got that joke of a gig with ESPN.com it’s funny to see him namedropping like he’s one of the boys. But on to my point: your “interaction” with him and his smugness is nothing new. It’s all fun and games when someone slurps him but the second that you say something he doesn’t like, he deletes your comment and then threatens to ban you from commenting on his blog. Case in point; in his Super Bowl review, he made a crack about Brenda Warner’s looks, and even the diehard Lukas munchers took him to task for it. He started with the smug replies, until someone pointed out that neither he nor his wildebeeest of a girlfriend are anything to look at, at which point he declared that the Brenda Warner bit was done and over with. Guess he didn’t like it when someone comments on HIS woman’s looks (and I use “woman” in the loosest possible sense of the word). Lukas is the living embodiment of someone who can dish it out but can’t take it.

By: Youppi

Youppi — Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:44:29 +0000

Thanks, Eick, for letting the people have their voice heard!!

By: shatraw

shatraw — Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:12:59 +0000

you’ll be happy to know that i’ve been emailing paul lukas for the last day, telling him how much of a pathetic idea thief he is. he just retorts with really smug shit like “stop! that tickles!”

i’m not sure i’ve ever hated someone i don’t know as much as i hate him. maybe i’ll start a facebook group…

By: Well Done Fillet

Well Done Fillet — Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:57:43 +0000

I actually peed with delight when I saw this…huzzah for you…..!

By: rossitron

rossitron — Wed, 25 Mar 2009 03:47:20 +0000

hallelujah!

actually, i was going to leave a comment on lukas’ blog entry, but didn’t want to sign up for an espn account. in that comment, though, i was going to mention the same thing about meat madness really being about competition in the form of reader input.

this particular topic (meat madness) is about the competition of meats, not ONE person’s opinion. there has to be something more to it than just one person deciding which meat is best, even if it involves a bracket format.

i think its clear that sogood’s meat madness beats out lukas’ in both concept and execution. i want to make a joke about beating his meat bracket, but i’ll refrain.